[/quote]
I'm not much of a writer my spelling is ok my punctuation is terrible I have been using Cors coils from the Ukrain this year and they are solid made and worked great and usualy 20-40 $ cheeper if not more then the detector brand ones if you can get them. The Whites Treasure Pro was a little annoying getting a good coil for it. Until something really new happens with the Tech First Texas/Garret and such seem to be skating on past success. I had high hopes for the F22-44 series but mine kept breaking down on the bubble buttons (replaced twice in 1 month). I know I am wierd I keep buying detectors and i don't care who makes them I just want to find the Glove out there and swing swing swing.
[/quote]
Nothing wrong with trying a lot of machines, I think it adds to the enjoyment of the hobby, to a certain degree. I went through a similar period a few years back, where I was struggling to find the perfect unit for my type of hunting, and went through a long succession of detectors. I started in the hobby with a MXT, and it was a very good machine. I found a lot with it, but admittedly, I was probably a bit too new to the hobby to squeeze all the juice the unit was capable of. Then...
I started hearing a bunch of chatter about the Minelab's, and bought a Safari. Coming from a traditional detector that simply beeped, the pinball-esque tones of the Safari were like Chinese to me, and I HATED the machine. But, go figure, I started finding some silver with it, so I struggled through with it. Cut to...
I was hunting with a friend one day who was using the F75, and we were hunting an old farmhouse. Due to the iron, my Safari was basically a total null. My buddy said that's why Minelab's sucked, and that's why he didn't use one. So, that experience, coupled with his words motivated me to sell the Safari.
From there, in fairly short order, I tried an Omega, F75, CZ3D & AT Gold. All were good, solid machines, and extremely capable, but for coin hunting in mineralized soil, which is a pretty specific application, the only machine that seemed to really excel by leaps & bounds was the CZ, which was one of the older, rarer 1021 models, which I personally had Dankowski tune to his exacting specifications. That machine, unlike the Minelab's, only had a few traditional tones, but BOY, could it punch deep. I was routinely pulling out coins at 8+ inches in good soil conditions, and was happier than a pig in mud. As I learned the unit more, I started pushing it to its max, and quickly found out that its Achilles Heel was calling deeper iron as coins. Not once or twice, or sometimes, but quite often. And, as I'm not much into surface hunting, that turned me off. So, after a good run of a couple of years with that machine, and lots of silvers, coppers, and great finds, I once again started detector shopping.
Then, surprise, surprise, another fella I knew was using the Safari with great success. I didn't understand how he could be doing so well, as when I had the machine, it confused the shit out of me. However, I broke down and bought another one. And this time, it all finally clicked. The machine basically became an extension of my arm, and I really put it through its paces. It's found me a heck of a lot, but, as I just posted in another thread, I seem to have hit the glass ceiling with it, and I'll be moving up into an Etrac, this Winter.
Sorry for the rant, but just wanted to illustrate that most of us in the hobby go through periods where we have to sample many machines, before kissing the bride and getting married. So, keep playing, experimenting, and see what works best for YOUR specific type of hunting, as that's the only thing that matters.
I agree about your First Texas/Garrett sentiments, and them seeming to skate on past successes, but, I find that to be true of pretty much all of the American manufacturers. They certainly aren't putting out crap, but nothing truly groundbreaking, IMO. Just gradual, minor tweaks, which they bill as the 'Latest & Greatest'. Much advancement has been made in recent years with speed/separation, however, no big leap on depth, so I'm hoping to see that in the coming years.
Joe